- it destroys free speech on the climate issue. In UK, the BBC is now an intellectual desert on the climate issue. Killed by censorship, suicided - if you like.
- misinforms the public about the scientific status of climate models, which I'm told are: "simple physics" and "settled science"
- misallocates research spending to pseudoscience - such as invalid climate models
- refuses to allocate sufficient funds to what matters - the study of the sun - so we know less than we should during GSM. This can kill people
- it attacks science and the scientific method.
- activists try to cancel those who support rigorous science: it destroys good science careers.
- it allows charlatans, incompetents and fakers to prosper
- it promotes the destruction of economies - as we replace reliable energy systems with weather, seasonal, and diurnal dependent systems. Evidenced by Germanys very expensive Energiewende having no effect in reducing greenhouse gas emissions
- now Biden is mongering for economic warfare against countries which fail his standards: it potentially promotes hot and cold wars. Before you dismiss the idea of climate alarmism causing hot wars - I'd like to remind you the Second World War was due to Malthusian beliefs on the part of the top Nazis. They believed the only way to secure the prosperity of the Germany people was to expand the land area of Germany.
- it promotes a nihilistic attitude to existence. When people blame humans for this, that and the other they become fatalistic, cynical, and sometimes suicidal in their personal lives and social attitudes. Instead of seeing human agency as the solution to problems they see people are the cause of problems.
- 'white people cause climate change' is now an excuse for promoting racial antagonism
- did I mention climatism concern is racist and anti-human?
- Who is the real enemy of Humanity?. Part 2
Sunday, 8 November 2020
Reasons to reject climate alarmism, and fake science
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Climate modeling fraud
" The data does not matter... We're not basing our recommendations on the data; we're basing them on the climate models. "...
-
If an atmospheric greenhouse effect existed for CO₂, it will be possible to measure the ‘back-radiation’. It will show up in both the ther...
-
We can understand the failure of the Greenhouse gas effect, GHGE, in explaining climate when we realize it's junk science. We're t...
-
“ I have never been convinced that there is ANY fingerprint of anthropogenic warming. ” — Dr Roy W. Spencer “ ... any increase in the ca...
No comments:
Post a Comment