Climate modeling fraud

"The data does not matter... We're not basing our recommendations on the data; we're basing them on the climate models."
- Professor Chris K. Folland; former IPCC lead author, UK Met Office Head of Climate Variability, later Climate Variability and Forecasting, and a modeling expert.

1. Proof they're right rests on expertise: that they're better scientists than their critics.
2. The say they know so much about climate that they can write it as a computer program.
3. Their climate programs then predict missing data for temperatures
4. The above explains why the're so emphatic that we agree on their predictions: "you must believe in climate change"; they say. When we agree with them we condone their status as experts. Their expert staus then enables them to make up reality to suit their bias, assumptions, and ideology.

PS: Scientific ideology which enables this pseudoscience became so widespread that it took over physics.