AGW CO2 somehow knows it's special!

Dumb question?

The IPCC claims that 95% of natural CO2 returns to surface sinks, but only 50% of fossil fuel emitted CO2 returns to the surface?

That’s how they calculate the fossil fuel warming effect. pic.twitter.com/qxQw7zhlgP

— True Science PEng, DFP, ADFS, MA, MBA. (@socratesccost) May 3, 2024

There's no Greenhouse Effect

If an atmospheric greenhouse effect existed for CO₂, it will be possible to measure the ‘back-radiation’. It will show up in both the thermal conductivity (λ) and isochoric thermal diffusivity (aᵥ) properties. Scientists will then be able to calculate it precisely using either or both these 2 physical properties of CO₂. But
Q: why do climate scientists not measure it that way; despite billions of dollars in funding lavished on them?
Q: Would attempting to measure it prove them wrong?

		amount present in atmosphere ( vol.)
	formula	ppm	relative to CO₂	λ (25 C), [ W / m K]	aᵥ [ m² / s ]
Nitrogen	N₂	780900	1855	0.0259	3.038 × 10⁻⁵
Oxygen	O₂	209400	497	0.0262	3.040 × 10⁻⁵
Argon	Ar	9300	22	0.0178	3.586 × 10⁻⁵
Carbon dioxide	CO₂	421	1	0.0167	1.427 × 10⁻⁵

λ :

thermal conductivity, determines how much heat per time unit and temperature difference flows in a medium;

aᵥ :

isochoric thermal diffusivity, determines how rapidly a temperature change spreads, expressed as area per time unit

Source:

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO₂ Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics, version 4;
Gerhard Gerlich & Ralf D. Tscheuschner, 2009,
arXiv:0707.1161 abstract, pdf

Michal E Mann (Climate scientist)

I have to take these tweets on trust, since I'm blocked from following him. But Michael E. Mann is a famous, and iconic, climate scientist. A true darling of the Left, academic, establishment. His honourary degrees and awards outnumber my academic qualifications. His Wikipedia entry, shows only a fraction of awards actually doled out to him.

He's serious.@MichaelEMann is no different.... pic.twitter.com/zzDKh72BKR

— 𝔻𝕒𝕨𝕟𝕋𝕁𝟡𝟘™ 🇵🇭💖🇨🇦 Climate of Dawn (@DawnTJ90) March 26, 2024

Dispite (me) being a relative imbecile, due to the weight of awards Mann has, compared to mine, I state, with certainty, that carbon dioxide, cyanide and arsenic are 3 very different substances, which behave in no way like CO₂. With water, Carbon dioxide, CO₂, is the basis for life on earth; Cyanide and arsenic are toxic poisons.