Saturday 27 January 2024

Reply to Sabine Hossenfelder on climate change.

Sabine Hossenfelder posted this doom laden article about the future.

This is my reply.


Climate change is NOT about the changing climate. It is a proxy eugenicist / Malthusian discussion. Climate change is an attempt at a grand ("Platonic" - see The Republic) noble lie. Like previous noble lies it's elite group-think. But unlike Socrates' noble lies and most from the past (religions, nationalisms, ...), today's noble lies are ONLY here to scare us - not to inspire us. Our elites no longer lead, they think they "nudge".

Climate sensitivity is pseudo-science. "Greenhouse gases", do not drive climate changes, nor does pollution, nor anything man-made. The sun dominates climate changes. Climate models are bad; varying from could-do-better to absolute garbage. Greenhouse gas climate models are the garbage. These are the official, IPCC, WEF, green-NGO models.

These model validations discussed here are pseudo or illegitimate science. In real (working) science it does not matter who validates a model because empiricist research is competence-based. Skilled empirical scientists agree. That's why the research is accepted as a validation. No theorist, nor modeller validates their own theory or model. But "climate change" is elite groupthink; a noble lie. Elites only want to hear lies. More importantly, they only you to hear lies. So, ONLY modelers and IPCC spawn are allowed to validate climate models. Non groupthink is rejected by scientific journals, and the researchers are monstered as 'climate deniers'. Big journals are all run by elites. For example, James Hansen is a modeler and greenhouse gas theorist. With good science he would not be validating his own work.

It's a shame Sabine was bought into the groupthink. I guess she makes too much money from elite funders. It really is evil lying to kids about the world ending. Sabine should be ashamed of herself.

Post Scripts

  1. Sabine has been invited to discuss this with expert doom-skeptics, but she refused as there was no payment for her.
  2. Not all noble lies are elite. For example: woke, Marxism, feminism, ... are anti-establishment. But anti-elite noble lies are all dreamt up by academics. None are validated (AKA: they don't work either).
  3. Other climate models, those unofficial, non-IPCC ones are interesting but every one of them - I "believed in" - disappointed me.

Recommended readings

  1. The Republic, by Plato
    see: the parable of the metals in Book III
  2. The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science, by Tim Ball, 2014
  3. The Grip of Culture, by Andy West, 2023
  4. Global Warming: A Case Study in Groupthink, by Christopher Booker, 2018

No comments:

Post a Comment

AGW CO2 somehow knows it's special!

Dumb question? The IPCC claims that 95% of natural CO2 returns to surface sinks, but only 50% of fossil fuel emitted CO2 returns to the surf...