Bret Weinstein is wrong on climate change

Bret Weinstein ((the guy who supports Ivermectin, and is somewhat suspicious of spike protein vaccines) promotes more climate alarm in his Odysee chat: "Justifying Riots (from Livestream #42)".

It's the usual nonsense liberals get up to when chatting about the evils of capitalism. The science is "Climate Crisis for Idiots" level. Bret is mates with James Hansen, so he repeats all of Hansen's myths and fairy tales about the greenhouse gas effect. His talk is so wrong headed. IMHO, if you don't know about climate science, you should probably shut up. It took me 2 years of intense study to understand the climate system. I already had a good understanding of maths, stats, chemistry and physics. Yet I still needed a lot of time to figure it out. I read scores of books and papers. Talked to lots of people.

It is the sun, not the man. Don Easterbrook has the best summary evidence for this.

What about the greenhouse gas effect?

Bret says "CO2 and methane trap heat". I already dealt with the fraudulent science behind this. "fraudulent science"! Isn't that a bit extreme? No, today, it's fraud. It is a sustained attempt to gaslight humanity with the general aim of promoting poverty and human limits. It was, arguably, bad science many decades ago, but modelers had the science explained to them time and again. By now, they either know they're wrong or they want to be wrong: to spread climate alarm, promote their careers, or both.

James Hansen is an extremely unreliable, fanatical, person. Oh, he's "nice", and a lefty like Bret. So Bret trusts him! There is no evidence for a greenhouse gas effect and plenty of evidence against it. The claim for the greenhouse gas effect is that, on average, it is supposed to warm earth's suface temperature by 32C. So point me to the empirical study which shows that. No such studies exist. Modelers, like Hansen, have no interest in science (which is empirical observation). Hansen is ONLY a modeller. During Obama's 8 years, climate science research funding was over $3billion per year. What did they do with their money? They did not demonstrate a greenhouse gas effect. They did not even seriously try. Elsewhere I explain, in detail, why the greenhouse gas effect is fake science.