tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9138684222900314613.post5858721095017099948..comments2023-11-02T12:28:34.767+00:00Comments on Green Fallacies: Renewable energy countries have lower CO2 emissions than nuclear powered countries - not!Jack Eddyfierhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00546379110958307956noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9138684222900314613.post-48346987814203703852018-07-16T21:30:38.212+00:002018-07-16T21:30:38.212+00:00Yes I knew. I covered that in my other blog. Nukes...Yes I knew. I covered that in my other blog. NukesPrettyPlease: http://nukespp.blogspot.com/2016/11/victory-speech.htmlJack Eddyfierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00546379110958307956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9138684222900314613.post-89192975798987999282017-01-29T07:15:09.970+00:002017-01-29T07:15:09.970+00:00You might qualify for a new solar program.
Find o...<b>You might qualify</b> for a new solar program. <br /><b><a href="http://green.syntaxlinks.com/r/BestSolarEnergySystem" rel="nofollow">Find out</a></b> if you are eligble now!Bloggerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07287821785570247118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9138684222900314613.post-62270810567919752492016-11-26T13:10:42.148+00:002016-11-26T13:10:42.148+00:00You might want to know that the Lawrence paper has...You might want to know that the Lawrence paper has been retracted: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2016.1260249Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00550470118697771460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9138684222900314613.post-27248621908832524342016-08-25T22:04:06.149+00:002016-08-25T22:04:06.149+00:00Power Mag don't think Sweden is a "nuclea...Power Mag don't think Sweden is a "nuclear phase out" country : http://www.powermag.com/abolished-nuclear-tax-relief-unprofitable-nuclear-operators-sweden/Jack Eddyfierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00546379110958307956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9138684222900314613.post-3998919486815421992016-08-24T04:39:04.771+00:002016-08-24T04:39:04.771+00:00Interestingly, the "climate targets" the...Interestingly, the "climate targets" they are slower at achieving don't ACTUALLY have any significant effect on climate change prevention. Their "target" is a switch-over to renewable power, not a reduction in CO2 emissions. In other words, when the report says they are slow to achieve their targets, I say, well that is fantastic!!! Because they will be faster at actually reducing CO2 emissions.Dolf RJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03606421597223338261noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9138684222900314613.post-57280203334616909352016-08-23T17:51:21.881+00:002016-08-23T17:51:21.881+00:00Over 15 issues so far. Just added another : No Ger...Over 15 issues so far. Just added another : No German GHG emissions reductions since 2009! Inept paper. Surely could not have been peer reviewed. Who gave it a free pass and why?Jack Eddyfierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00546379110958307956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9138684222900314613.post-60330628509702200862016-08-23T16:11:24.203+00:002016-08-23T16:11:24.203+00:00Confoundingly there are so many confounding factor...Confoundingly there are so many confounding factors so as to make the findings meaningless. I wonder how a study that groups Western vs Eastern European nations would fare. I don't however need to wonder how individual countries fare irrespective of groupings by political leanings. <br /><br />We already know where Germany is faring WRT CO2 reductions. Nada! Zip! Just chalk Germany up as a failed experiment. Now let's get on with the real task at hand: implement nuclear to acheive twin goals of energy prosperity and reduced greenhouse gases.Ike Bottemahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10681160329849216716noreply@blogger.com